החל משלהי שנת 2019, וירוס בלתי מוכר הופיע בערים שונות ברחבי העולם. בתאריך ה- 11 במארס 2020 הכריז ארגון הבריאות העולמי על התפשטות וירוס הקוביד-19 (covid-19), שכונה גם קורונה, כמגיפה כלל עולמית.
בעוד ערים סביב העולם הסתגלו לחיים לצד מגיפת הקורונה, המצב הבלתי רגיל סיפק מצע פורה לביצוע רפלקציה על החיים בעיר בזמן מגיפה ועל השלכותיה.
מרכז העיר הזמין סטודנטים וסטודנטיות מרחבי העולם לחלוק את מחשבותיהם והתרשמויותיהם מהאופן בו עריהם הושפעו ועודן מושפעות מהקורונה.
פרוייקט ערים וקורונה - Cities & Covid-19 Project - מוגש לקוראים ולקוראות בשפה האנגלית ונועד להציג נקודות מבט שונות אודות חיים עירוניים בשנת 2020 במהלך מגיפת הקורונה, בשעה שעדיין הייתה נוכחת בעוצמה בערי העולם.
Image credit: virus image by piro from pixabay

Cities & Covid-19 | Alexandroupolis, Greece
Angeliki Anagnostou
Research students from around the world share their impressions of urban living
through the pandemic | A TAU City Center special project
City and city life in the COVID-19 era
On the 17th of March 2020, BBC News announced: “The outbreak of the coronavirus has led to the emptying of public spaces around the world, (…).” All the media presented an image of cities, to which we are not used. Abandoned streets, mass transportation without masses, closed stores, people at home, silence…the so-called ghost cities. However, even though the global pandemic begot the same situation everywhere, the image of cities differs worldwide. We are bombarded with images of metropolitan areas, big famous cities, popular touristic destinations etc. But what about a medium-sized city in Greece?
Returning from the Netherlands to Greece, during the beginning of the lockdown,
I confronted a new Greek reality.
The Greek government took strict measures quite fast and the movement of people was allowed for a prescribed set of essential reasons. Apart from moving to and from the workplace and shopping for food or medicine, the most common reason for movement was exercising individually, in pairs or walking a pet.
Although the quarantine affected many aspects of our lives, it was pleasant to see my hometown (Alexandroupolis, Greece) more livable than ever.
Every area was full of people, residents were walking even in not well-known places. It was almost impossible to find an empty bench. Pedestrians and cyclists were much more than cars. The sidewalks were free for walk without the numerous coffee tables, blocking the accessibility. The Greek coffee drinking culture was not disappeared though. Many small cafes offered the “take away” option and Greek people enjoyed their coffee in public space socializing with others but always from distance.
Despite the readjustment on the proxemics, it seems that COVID-19 made people more social in public space. They stop more often to greet and discuss, they smile to each other, developing so a new kind of social life, with social distancing to be a must.
It is undeniable that COVID -19 influenced negatively many aspects of our lives and changed the way we live, but everyone can learn something out of it. Specifically, it seems that Greek people reconsidered the meaning and the importance of public space during the pandemic. But what will happen when this acute crisis comes to an end? What will we keep after this?
Her diverse educational background and her work experience, both in Greece and the Netherlands has provided her with a wide range of skills in Architecture, Urban and Landscape Design. She has a strong research orientation, which she likes to combine with design in practice. Her research interests concern mainly the meaning and appropriation of public space, emphasizing on the locality, the socio-cultural background of people and generally the behavior of people in the cities.
For her, the methodology and the process to reach a design solution is as important as the final outcome. As a designer, she considers people’s opinions important, as we design for them and her ambition is to make them feel welcome and happy in their cities.
About the author
Angeiki Anagnostou is a registered Architect Engineer at the Technical Chamber of Greece and Urban Designer, graduated from TUDelft, living in Haarlem, the Netherlands.

Photo Gallery (click for more details)

Cities & Covid-19 | Chennai, India
Mahesh Balasubramani
Research students from around the world share their impressions of urban living
through the pandemic | A TAU City Center special project
Deploying technology and idle resources in innovative ways: Key ingredients to urban resilience
I was born and raised in Chennai and I have spent 28 years of my life here.
Chennai is the capital city of Tamil Nadu, a provincial state which geographically forms the South-Eastern tip of India. The COVID-19 pandemic, as in the case with any other city, transcended into an unprecedented crisis in urban life and machinery of Chennai.
Attracting about 45% of the country’s foreign health tourists to its private-owned hospitals, Chennai is held to be the ‘Health Capital of India’. The city topped the list for highest number of COVID-19 diagnostic tests conducted and highest recovery percentage in the country.
Unavoidably, most of the private-owned hospitals in Chennai shut their gates to ailments except for emergencies. However, this closure casted the attention on ancient, traditional healing practices like Ayurveda and Siddha as patients of non-COVID ailments flocked these clinics for unconditional treatment. Some consultants, particularly the dermatologists, used WhatsApp video calls for patient consultation. A reputed private hospital deployed a mobile application for providing consultations and authorized prescriptions.
The Koyambedu Market Complex in the city, one of the largest perishable goods market in Asia, was closed to curtail the spread of the virus.
In response, new markets were set up in school and college playgrounds as educational institutions remained closed. Smaller trucks, which were idle without transport consignments, were employed by municipal corporations and entrepreneurial individuals to take supplies directly from the larger trucks and sell/distribute the perishables at major junctions in a locality.
Mobile carts, which were previously put in use as petty shops outside religious and historic attractions, were mobilized to take supplies from the smaller trucks for street-level sale of perishables.
Virus-idled labourers set up stationary vegetable/fruit shops opposite residential apartments. Supermarkets accepted orders through WhatsApp and sent alerts for pickup. Many vendors made fresh provisions to accept digital/mobile wallet payments.
While Chennai ranks poorly in the recreational space per capita, the closure of these scarce recreation spaces ever since the lockdown added to the city’s woes.
The residents found alternative, interesting avenues like flying kites or playing Ludo boards for recreation. Ludo also became the highest downloaded mobile game in this period of lockdown (250 million downloads during this COVID-19 lockdown).
However, there were other instances wherein path dependencies were reconfigured in undesirable ways.
Chennai ranks second in the country for the share of daily trips made through public transport. In spite of government and private organizations being allowed to operate recently, public transport modalities were still not restored. Though Chennai is known for its efficiency in solid waste management, solid waste collection services ceased to operate in peripheral localities amidst COVID-19. More than 200,000 migrant labourers who lost their livelihoods were sent from Chennai to their native states at the cost of the government.
Now that construction industry in the city is swinging back to normal, the city will encounter significant challenges in mobilising these labourers back. In the process of recovering from COVID-19, the city has important lessons to learn on inculcating resilience. Questions remain on how technology and idle resources can be deployed in novel ways.
He pursued his Masters Degree on Construction Technology & Management as well at Indian Institute of Technology Madras. His doctoral research looks at how governance arrangements in infrastructure megaprojects take shape and evolve. Having submitted his initial doctoral thesis, Mahesh awaits the final defense/viva-voce. He has particular interests in the research on sociomateriality of disruptive and sustainable transitions that are required today in urban and rural infrastructure settings. He looks forward to shaping his academic-research career in development planning.

About the author
Mahesh Balasubramani is an about-to-graduate PhD Scholar with the Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India.
Photo Gallery (click for more details)

Cities & Covid-19 | Dortmund, Germany & Bergamo, Italy
Stefano Cozzolino
Research students from around the world share their impressions of urban living
through the pandemic | A TAU City Center special project
How is life in cities affected by the spread of coronavirus?
This is a good question as many topics may be raised and discussed.
For example, one might decide to tackle certain technical problems such as the difficulty to deal with social-distancing measures or address certain socioeconomic issues like the impact of restrictions on local businesses and jobs.
Eventually, one might also write about fears and anxiety connected to risks. Nevertheless, what I learnt from this experience is that the biggest change is not external (and visible) but instead internal. It is about how we perceive and experience reality.
It is from February 24th that I (physically) live in one place, Dortmund, but I’m emotionally connected to another city; my hometown, Bergamo, the city most seriously affected by the spread of coronavirus in the world. Before the virus, I was used to going back home to Bergamo every three weeks to visit relatives and friends. Like many other people in the world, I used to commute quite a lot and share multiple places.
For me it was natural to have, let’s say, two lives, one in Italy and one in Germany. Well, don’t get me wrong, my life is just one but it is between two cities. I’m sure many can easily understand what I mean because this kind of lifestyle is becoming very common.
Living in two cities was for me (and for my brain) an easy routine. Things got more complicated with the spread of the virus and the consequent lock-down of Italy in March because it obliged me to stay in Germany.
The main consequence is that I had to learn how to live not only in two different cities but in totally different psychological worlds. One based on constant fears and daily tragedies. It has been estimated that 7.000 people died in Bergamo, while the other, Dortmund, is scarcely affected by the virus (overall, “only” 600 cases of infection and a dozen of intensive care treatments).
One where the local administration was not able to track the number of deaths nor could find places to store and then bury coffins, while in the other, where I live physically, people are protesting against the introduction of certain “minimum” social distancing measures. One world, Bergamo, in which the first things you ask people is “how is your family? Are they okay?” or “do you know that Mr. X or Ms. Y passed away?”, while in the other people complain because they cannot go to concerts or have a barbecue in a public park.
I know this story is not so much about cities, at least directly. But all this affects the perception of cities to a large extent.
About the author
Stefano Cozzolino works as Senior Researcher at ILS – Research Institute for Regional and Urban Development and as a lecturer at RWTH Aachen University (Germany). His main research interest focuses on the interplay between planning/design and the evolution of spontaneous social-spatial configurations.
Photo Gallery (click for more details)

Cities & Covid-19 | Hamburg, Germany
Nora Mariella Küttel
Research students from around the world share their impressions of urban living
through the pandemic | A TAU City Center special project
Public Space, (No)Body & Expression
As for many others, my life has thoroughly changed in the past couple of weeks – or is it months already?
Instead of splitting my weeks between Hamburg and Münster, instead of spending hours in trains, instead of meeting friends, instead of playing soccer, instead of hugging my family, I work, teach, exercise, and worry in and from my one-bedroom apartment. But despite these and other personal changes and challenges[1], I observe changes in public urban spaces, too.
Although Hamburg is less crowded now due to the absence of tourists, almost all sidewalks I’ve strolled are too narrow to keep the recommended distance of at least 1.5 meters. With more people choosing the bike over public transport (which is great) and a bicycle infrastructure that was conceived with anything but the bike in mind, walking and cycling in Hamburg does feel like being on an obstacle course now more than ever.
On a positive note, however, the current situation could teach us on how urban space could be divided and used in the future. A district in Berlin, for example, reacted to the change in mobility habits and created pop-up bike lanes on former parking lanes. And during the closure of playgrounds, the kids in my neighborhood discovered spaces for play that before were probably best described as terrain vague.
But what struck me the most was to see how political articulation and demonstration changed its space.
As the freedom to demonstrate (Demonstrationsfreiheit) has become severely restricted due to infection prevention, people turn to walls, windows, and sidewalks even more to express their opinions and demands.
Thus, messages may remain in the public sphere longer than they might with the ephemeral manner of demonstrations and marches which often only last for a couple of hours. However, how strong and effective can protest in public spaces be if one crucial element[2][3] is missing: the human body[4]?
Notes and bibliography
[1] However, I speak from a privileged point of view as a person who is used to freedom of movement, of speech, etc., with little care work, and living in a country with a fairly good health care system.
[2] Butler, Judith (2011): Bodies in Alliance and the Politics of the Street. Lecture held in Venice, 7 September 2011, in the framework of the Series The State of Things, organized by the Office for Contemporary Art Norway (OCA), https://transversal.at/transversal/1011/butler/en.
[3] Marchart, Oliver (2012): Protest, Tanz, Körper – die Passage von Kunst zu Politik. In: Frankfurter Kunstverein (Hrsg.) (2012): Demonstrationen. Vom Werden normativer Ordnungen, Verlag für Moderne Kunst, Nürnberg, S. 100-113.
[4] This does not only include the body as the performative actor who blocks a street, holds a banner, acts collectively, etc. but also the body as the receiver of messages.
About the author
Nora Mariella Küttel is a geographer and urban designer, living in Hamburg. Her research interests include bottom-up urbanism, urban ethnography, theories on space and place as well as feminist geography. Currently, she researches and teaches at the University of Münster where she also writes her doctoral thesis on the interactions of visual art and urban space in Detroit, USA.
Photo Gallery (click for more details)

Cities & Covid-19 | Prato, Italy
Flavia Giallorenzo
Research students from around the world share their impressions of urban living
through the pandemic | A TAU City Center special project
How is life in cities affected by the spread of coronavirus?
Prato (Tuscany, Italy) is my city and the place where I live. Just 20 km divide Prato to Florence with a short straight piece of highway connecting these two as intertwined as different urban realms.
Before Covid-19 commuting was the mainstay of my working days, but then, actions, acts, time, and spaces - that once were social exchanges, passages, standstills, familiar faces of strangers, noisy crowded trains - have become off-limits spaces and inconceivable moments.
Tuscany, have been touched by the epidemy less than other parts of Italy like the northern regions, but, since the first cases in Italy - in the last days of January - Prato has been under the attention because it is the second-most populated Chinese community in Europe. Those days, celebrations for the Chinese New Year were going to start, but the traditional parade in Prato was cancelled because it would have been too crowdy and dangerous in the Coronavirus era.
Despite early concerns and politically driven controversies about families who were visiting their relatives and friends in China, Prato has had one of the least numbers of cases and deceases in Tuscany, also thanks to the responsibility of the community. This complex social system of emerging multicultural energies in the city has lived the lockdown as anywhere else in Italy.
Finally, after two months of (almost) total national lock-down, during which people could not get out their houses excluding few exceptions, the government decided to gradually re-open activities.
Walking back down the streets of my city stimulate me, exploring familiar and, at the same time, unprecedented urban spaces.
What better place to look at this revolution than the street level, considering that “[i]n Jacobs's view […] ‘animated alleys’ are the constantly renovating interface between the hardware and software of a city”(Perrone, 2019: 11)[1].
In spaces, something once very familiar such as entering in a shop or working must be fast rethought, adapting our (previous) spontaneous behaviour to new patterns, unprecedented situations.
During the lock-down period, empty streets and strict-ruled behaviours were the normality, remembering dystopic panoramas[2], but today people are gradually getting more creative, within the range of possibility given by the top-down laws. Bottom-up planning and self-organization seems to be widespread in the city, a vibrant (new?) city.
Bibliography
[1] Perrone, Camilla. (2019). ‘Downtown Is for People’: The street-level approach in Jane Jacobs' legacy and its resonance in the planning debate within the complexity theory of cities. Cities. 91. 10.1016/j.cities.2018.12.023.
[2] https://www.corriere.it/cronache/20_marzo_21/prato-lunghissima-coda-fare-spesa-all-esselunga-foto-simbolo-9bddf86c-6b8d-11ea-8bdc-8d7efa0d8720.shtml
Her research project is about strategic spatial planning and complexity, focusing on digital home-sharing platforms effects on public spaces. Recently, it has been necessary to open reflections on Covid-19 pandemic and the home sharing market, considering the complex nature of both phenomena. She is interested in complexity science and socio-spatial dynamics in (post)metropolitan urban realms. She tries to look at contexts both through quantitative and qualitative approaches. Publications include Perrone C., Rossi M., Giallorenzo F., “Regions are back in town. Un approccio strategico e transcalare alla governance dei confine”, Contesti, vol. 1/2018, p. 204-219; Perrone C., Rossi M., Giallorenzo F., (eds.) “The city from the outside in. A visual exploration of emerging peripheral urbanity” Florence University Press (forthcoming).
About the author
Flavia Giallorenzo is currently a PhD student in Architecture, Urban and Territorial Planning at the University of Florence (Italy). Master graduated in City and Territory's Planning and Design, in 2017 she joined the Critical Planning and Design Lab (University of Florence).

Photo Gallery (click for more details)

Cities & Covid-19 | Tel Aviv-Jaffa, Israel
Romy Chillag
Research students from around the world share their impressions of urban living
through the pandemic | A TAU City Center special project
The importance of urban nature a hundred meters from home
Are you also exploring in the last months what is in the proximity of your home? Do you also feel the need for open and green spaces?
On May 17, 2020 new measurements by the Israeli Ministry of Health have set out, according to the corona virus guidelines. The measurements determined that going to parks, beaches and public spaces is forbidden. These public spaces became inaccessible to the public, even if social distancing was carried out, while other spaces were allowed. This caused distress and confusion among the public. However, it is interesting to know that during the cholera epidemic, it was decided that there was a need to establish more parks in London, to heal the public (Thompson, 2011).
In this article, I will review several historical and current anecdotes about public health and the importance of accessibility to parks.
Many studies have explored how leaving the house and spending time in a natural environment contributes greatly to mental and physical health, for people of all ages. Researcher Catherine Ward Thompson, a landscape architect, explores the connection between human health and residential proximity to nature and parks. In her article "Linking landscape and health: The recurring theme", she reviews the positive effects living near parks and green areas in cities has on health: an influence researchers has named “Vitamin G” (Green).
In the city of Tokyo, a dense metropolitan city with about 14 million inhabitants, dense urban areas were examined. Researchers have found a direct link between an increase in the survival rate and the life expectancy of elderly citizens and their access to a green environment, parks, and trees.
In many other cities that have been examined, studies have shown that there is a direct correlation between the decline in stress and anxiety levels of residents, decrease in morbidity and increase in life expectancy, and the proximity of the residential space to natural green areas (Thompson, 2011). Apart from the decline in stress levels that are typical for a life in a busy and crowded city, additional benefits were found, such as an increase in attention and concentration levels as a result of more frequent visits to parks.
In addition to the benefits it offers people, urban nature environments also provide system-support services such as: balancing climate change effects, providing wildlife habitat and preservation of biodiversity (Baur et al., 2013)
Epidemics, health and the importance of parks
The idea of accessibility to public parks within the city started at the end of the industrial revolution. The main goal was to maintain the health of the urban population that rapidly grew in Europe's most polluted cities. Therefore, the principle of accessibility was important so all population strata will be able to breathe fresh air, recover and vacate.
Epidemics hold an important part in establishing and developing parks. During the first Cholera epidemic of England in 1832, the elected committee for public trips, has announced to the British parliament the need to create spaces of leisure and recreation. Therefore, it has been urged to enact a law requiring to allocate space in each city for a stroll or a park to improve the health conditions in the country.
The establishment of Victoria Park in east London
Victoria Park in London was established in the east of the city in an industrial, polluted and crowded. These neighborhoods were built between many pollutants. In 1830, some 400,000 residents lived in this area and worked as factory workers. But the living conditions did not allow for a healthy life, because the air, the water and the streams were polluted.
Fear of diseases, such as Cholera, Typhus and Tuberculosis, grew among the rich population. They were concerned the viruses may come from these polluted and crowded areas and will scatter the rich and clean parts of London. It was thus decided to build a park in the east of the city, that would contribute to reducing the number of deaths and adding a few years to the life of the population that lives in these neighborhoods, thereby promote the economy. "The park is designed to benefit the health of the employees and their families by inhaling fresh air at least Once a week it is very important" (Alston, 1847). Another quote that illustrates the importance of creating the parks during this period is: "The pale mechanic and the exhausted factory operative might inhale the freshening breeze and some portion of recovered health" (Smith, 1852, in Schuyler, 1986, p. 60).
Conclusion
We are at a time where a mere stroll in the park raises concerns and might be not accessible to all the population. Considering the studies above, perhaps focusing on making our natural urban sources can contribute to our health. Especially in an epidemic in which an elderly and sick population should breathe clean air, rejuvenate and heal. Perhaps at a stressful and uncertain time like this, we should especially take care of maintaining our health and our mental health by spending time in nature. In order to recover from the stress, we must experience quality nature, especially in the months of spring, when the flowers bloom and nature is rejuvenating.
As many of us has experienced a difficulty finding green areas around our homes, a central conclusion from this epidemic is the need for planning better cities. Cities which integrate nature and quality public spaces. Places where you can find peace and tranquility from the busy life, to be present in the magic of nature, to relax and heal. I call the decision makers in Israel, embrace the 19th-century London approach and make sure that the public spaces planned will be open and accessible. These spaces can support both man and nature.
Bibliography
Baur, J. W. R., Gómez, E., & Tynon, J. F. (2013). Urban Nature Parks and Neighborhood Social Health in Portland, Oregon. Journal of Park & Recreation Administration, 31(4), 23–44.
Thompson, C. W. (2011). Linking landscape and health: The recurring theme. Landscape and urban planning, 99(3-4), 187-195.
Schuyler, D., 1986. The New Urban Landscape: The Redefinition of City Form in Nineteenth-Century America. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
About the author
Romy Chillag, founder of Romy Urban Nature Tours. A Master’s student for urban planning in Tel Aviv University, researching urban nature, works in the Ministry of Environmental Protection and professional tour instructor in the city and Nature.
Photo Gallery (click for more details)